Navigating Debt Recovery in the UAE: Insights on Leveraging Commercial Licenses as Attachable Assets

Debt Recovery is a critical aspect of financial transactions, crucial for individuals and businesses alike; hence efficient recovery of unpaid debts is vital for maintaining financial security.  The recent judgment by the General Assembly of the Dubai Court of Cassation in Cassation No. 1 of 2024 issued on 31 January 2024 (the “General Assembly Judgment”), has expanded the options of attachable assets in relation to debt recovery. Before discussing the nuances of this judgment, let us look into the framework of debt recovery in the UAE.

 

I. Legal Framework of Debt Recovery in the UAE

Debt recovery in the UAE is governed by a set of laws, rules and regulations. However, the primary laws addressing debt recovery are the UAE Civil Transactions Law (Federal Law No. 5 of 1985) and the UAE Commercial Transactions Law (Federal Law No. 50 of 2022). Additionally, other laws dealing with debt recovery and restructuring include Federal Decree-Law No. (51) of 2023 promulgating the new Financial and Bankruptcy Law.

 

II. Key Laws Governing Debt Recovery in the UAE:

  • Federal Decree Law No. (5) of 1985 Promulgating Civil Transactions Law: This law (as amended) provides the legal framework for debt collection in the UAE, outlining the rights and obligations of creditors and debtors and providing legal remedies for debt collection.
  • Federal Decree Law No. (50) of 2022 Promulgating UAE Commercial Transactions Law: Governs the collection of commercial debts and provides additional legal remedies for debt collection.
  • Federal Decree Law No. (31) of 2021 Promulgating the Crimes and Penalties Law: Provides criminal penalties for debtors who fail to pay their debts or provide false information to creditors.
  • Federal Decree-Law No. (51) of 2023 Promulgating the UAE Financial and Bankruptcy Law: Aims to reserve the rights of creditors and assist the debtor in settling its debts with its creditors.
  • UAE Central Bank regulations: The Central Bank of the UAE has issued several regulations and guidelines related to debt collection practices, including regulations on debt collection agencies, fair debt collection practices, and the use of credit reporting agencies.
  • UAE Ministry of Economy regulations: The Ministry of Economy has also issued regulations related to debt recovery, including guidelines on the use of electronic payment systems and the resolution of disputes between creditors and debtors.

 

III. Implications of the General Assembly Judgment:

The General Assembly Judgment, in alignment with the UAE Civil Transactions Law and Federal Decree-Law No. (42) of 2022 promulgating the Civil Procedure Code (“CPC”), emphasizes that all of a debtor’s property serves as security for their obligations, unless exempted under Article 242 of CPC or another special law.

This landmark ruling establishes that a company’s commercial license and intangible assets contribute significantly to its overall value and can be materially assessed, and therefore can be the object of a lien, unless they are non-transactional by nature or by operation of law.

This is a significant departure from the previous legal interpretation set by Cassation No. 122 of 2018 (Real Estate), which viewed commercial licenses as non-transferable personal authorizations without inherent value beyond the individual holder, rendering them ineligible as security.

This shift is advantageous for creditors, as the ability to attach a company’s commercial license and intangible assets adds substantial pressure on debtors to settle their debts. Overall, this judgment enhances the insolvency legal framework of the UAE, providing a more robust and creditor-friendly environment.

 

IV. Conclusion

The strategic use of commercial licenses as attachable assets in debt recovery can be a potent tool for creditors. However, it is essential for individuals and businesses to grasp the legal framework and ramifications of such actions when navigating the debt recovery process in the UAE.

 

 

Disclaimer

This publication does not provide any legal advice and it is for information purposes only. You should not rely upon the material or information in this publication as a basis for making any business, legal or other decisions. Therefore, any reliance on such material is strictly at your own risk.

Author: Lien Haroun (Executive Associate) & Thara Kumar

Author

Executive Associate – Lien Haroun

Share this post on: 

Author

Executive Associate – Lien Haroun

RELATED NEWS

Revolutionizing Cost Allocation in ICC Arbitration: The Dubai Court of Cassation’s Landmark Decision on Article 38

The Dubai Court of Cassation (DCC) has ruled that unilateral arbitration clauses, which grant one party exclusive discretion to choose arbitration as a dispute resolution mechanism, are unenforceable under UAE law. This decision emphasizes the importance of mutual consent and clarity in arbitration agreements, highlighting the need for fair and balanced drafting to ensure enforceability.

Jurisdiction of the Insurance Dispute Resolution Committees (IDRC) in the UAE: Scope and Territorial Competence

Challenging jurisdiction is a critical defense strategy that lawyers often evaluate at the outset of a case. This article explores the jurisdictional scope of the UAE’s Insurance Dispute Resolution Committees (IDRC) in light of Federal Decree by Law No. (42) of 2022 and the IA Board of Directors Decision No. (33) of 2019. It addresses whether IDRC branches in specific Emirates, such as Dubai, are territorially restricted or have nationwide competence. Drawing on recent case law, including Dubai Court of Cassation Case No. 96 of 2024, the analysis concludes that all IDRC branches operate with federal jurisdiction across the UAE, irrespective of their physical location.